Greg Stein gstein@microsoft.com
Fri, 20 Sep 1996 11:33:16 -0700

I'd support moving the db-sig to "inactive," although I do want to try
to find some time to update the DatabaseAPI document and actually
include a link to it from the db-sig page.

sigh... maybe I can manage to get to it this weekend.

Moving forward, if somebody *does* propose to keep db-sig active, then I
wouldn't be opposed to another "owner" as I don't think that my current
business/personal directions coincide with it any more...


>From: 	Ken Manheimer[SMTP:klm@CNRI.Reston.Va.US]
>Sent: 	Friday, September 20, 1996 10:46 AM
>To: 	meta-sig@python.org
>Cc: 	fdrake@CNRI.Reston.Va.US
>Subject: 	Re: [PYTHON META-SIG] SIG cleanup?
>Re retirement of the progenv sig.  On one hand, it does not seem to be
>needed for any active, sustained collaborations.  On the other hand, it
>now provides a home (last changed in early september) for fred drake's
>parser module development.  If the progenv sig goes away, we should find
>another home for it - fred, any preferences, suggestions? 
>In general, i'm quite impressed with how useful some sigs have been, as
>channels for targeted collaboration, and feel the experiment is a
>distinct success.  I don't think we need to place too much burden
>on justifying the creation of a sig, as long as we keep vigilant about
>retiring ones that are no longer necessary.  Otherwise it'll be more
>difficult for people to find the active ones...
>Ken Manheimer		klm@cnri.reston.va.us	    703 620-8990 x268
>	    (orporation for National Research |nitiatives
>	# If you appreciate Python, consider joining the PSA! #
>		  # <http://www.python.org/psa/>. #
>META-SIG  - SIG on Python.Org SIGs and Mailing Lists
>send messages to: meta-sig@python.org
>administrivia to: meta-sig-request@python.org

META-SIG  - SIG on Python.Org SIGs and Mailing Lists

send messages to: meta-sig@python.org
administrivia to: meta-sig-request@python.org