[C++-SIG] RE: [META-SIG] Terminating comatose SIGs

[David Arnold]

-->"Ken" == Ken Manheimer <klm@CNRI.Reston.Va.US> writes:

  Ken> What i *propose* is that sig managers, who should all be on
  Ken> this list, all suggest a wrap-up date for their sigs, and
  Ken> others can comment on those dates if they feel a burning need.

i'd suggest that the DO-SIG could complete most of its work by June
1998 if you'd like to set that.

of course, i'm open to other opinions ...


  Ken> If you have a SIG that really is inactive, consider immediate
  Ken> retirement as a good, and revocable, option.

what does the reinstatement of a SIG entail?  reactivation of the
mailing list and moving the SIG entry back to the "live" list?

i can see things like the progenv, pattern and web SIGs being
periodically busy as new people or technologies create new momentum.


-- David Arnold   ,=================================================
================='                             +617 33654310 (voice)
CRC for Distributed Systems Technology         +617 33654311   (fax)
University of Queensland                    davida@pobox.com (email)
Australia                     <http://www.pobox.com/~davida>   (web)

  In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice; in
      practice, however, there is no similarity - Dave Butenhof.


_______________
META-SIG  - SIG on Python.Org SIGs and Mailing Lists

send messages to: meta-sig@python.org
administrivia to: meta-sig-request@python.org
_______________