[Neuroimaging] Discourse category for DICOM discussions
satra at mit.edu
Sat Jul 10 13:18:57 EDT 2021
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 12:56 PM Matthew Brett <matthew.brett at gmail.com>
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 5:41 PM Satrajit Ghosh <satra at mit.edu> wrote:
> > hi matthew,
> > i don't have a good answer to that other than it seems to have worked
> out ok across the various python and other software tools discussed on
> neurostars. perhaps the folks here could decide or we go with trying out
> neurostars and seeing if we really run into those issues.
> > the other option for more specificity is to turn on discussions on the
> github repo itself. that keeps it close to the code. here is an example of
> trying to balance code, proximity, outreach, and community:
> Ah - I think that doesn't match our problem here - because we're
> thinking about how to coordinate development across at least three
> different projects, and therefore, repositories.
> On reflection, I'd prefer to stick with the nipy.discourse.group DICOM
> category, to have one place devoted to those discussions. If it
> looks like the discussions are getting more general than developing
> DICOM conversion and APIs across the Python packages, then we can move
> to Neurostars.
> I don't see any need for this to compete with Neurostars - this is a
> very specific developer discussion forum (to which, of course, anyone
> is welcome), rather than the more general focus of Neurostars.
> So - as you were - please do join us over at:
> Neuroimaging mailing list
> Neuroimaging at python.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Neuroimaging