[Neuroimaging] Discourse category for DICOM discussions
Zvi Baratz
z.baratz at gmail.com
Sat Jul 10 14:02:06 EDT 2021
Hi,
Apologies for the delay, please fill in your preferences for the next
meeting at this Doodle
<https://doodle.com/poll/ba2xf5f5dddpchmb?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link>
poll.
As Matthew suggested, this will be a "show-and-tell" in which the lead
maintainers of NiBabel, dcmstack, highdicom, and dicom_parser (myself) will
give a quick demo and/or guided tour of the codebase.
I think very exciting things are ahead - collaborating and integrating the
functionalities of these packages together could significantly enhance many
researchers' ability to access, share, and study large-scale DICOM archives.
Looking forward!
Zvi
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 8:19 PM Satrajit Ghosh <satra at mit.edu> wrote:
> hi matthew,
>
> sounds good.
>
> cheers,
>
> satra
>
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 12:56 PM Matthew Brett <matthew.brett at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 5:41 PM Satrajit Ghosh <satra at mit.edu> wrote:
>> >
>> > hi matthew,
>> >
>> > i don't have a good answer to that other than it seems to have worked
>> out ok across the various python and other software tools discussed on
>> neurostars. perhaps the folks here could decide or we go with trying out
>> neurostars and seeing if we really run into those issues.
>> >
>> > the other option for more specificity is to turn on discussions on the
>> github repo itself. that keeps it close to the code. here is an example of
>> trying to balance code, proximity, outreach, and community:
>> https://github.com/dandi/helpdesk/issues/new/choose
>>
>> Ah - I think that doesn't match our problem here - because we're
>> thinking about how to coordinate development across at least three
>> different projects, and therefore, repositories.
>>
>> On reflection, I'd prefer to stick with the nipy.discourse.group DICOM
>> category, to have one place devoted to those discussions. If it
>> looks like the discussions are getting more general than developing
>> DICOM conversion and APIs across the Python packages, then we can move
>> to Neurostars.
>>
>> I don't see any need for this to compete with Neurostars - this is a
>> very specific developer discussion forum (to which, of course, anyone
>> is welcome), rather than the more general focus of Neurostars.
>>
>> So - as you were - please do join us over at:
>>
>> https://nipy.discourse.group/c/python-dicom
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Matthew
>> _______________________________________________
>> Neuroimaging mailing list
>> Neuroimaging at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/neuroimaging
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Neuroimaging mailing list
> Neuroimaging at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/neuroimaging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.python.org/pipermail/neuroimaging/attachments/20210710/5b02be9f/attachment.html>
More information about the Neuroimaging
mailing list