[Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

josef.pktd at gmail.com josef.pktd at gmail.com
Tue May 3 17:24:30 EDT 2011


On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Ralf Gommers
<ralf.gommers at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Christoph Gohlke <cgohlke at uci.edu> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/3/2011 11:18 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am pleased to announce the availability of the second release
>>> candidate of NumPy 1.6.0.
>>>
>>> Compared to the first release candidate, one segfault on (32-bit
>>> Windows + MSVC) and several memory leaks were fixed. If no new
>>> problems are reported, the final release will be in one week.
>>>
>>> Sources and binaries can be found at
>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.6.0rc2/
>>> For (preliminary) release notes see below.
>>>
>>> Enjoy,
>>> Ralf
>>>
>>
>> Looks good. The msvc9/MKL builds now pass all tests on win32 and
>> win-amd64, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.1, and 3.2.
>
> Good, thanks for testing.
>>
>> One scipy test failure reported earlier remains, but that is probably no
>> release blocker.
>> <http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2011-April/055877.html>
>
> That's a problem in scipy.stats, that only showed up recently because
> of a bug fix in numpy.testing.

Sorry, I don't have 1.6 to test, but what are assertions like

np.testing.assert_array_less(2, np.inf)
np.testing.assert_array_less(np.array([ 0.911,  1.065,  1.325,  1.587]), np.inf)

supposed to be with numpy 1.6 ?

Josef

>
> Cheers,
> Ralf
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>



More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list