[Numpy-discussion] numpy.filled, again

[josef.pktd at gmail.com]

On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:43 PM, <josef.pktd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Charles R Harris
>> <charlesr.harris at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> So this petered off...any objections to np.full?
>
>
> No objection.

full full full

np.full  full of what?

full of the number it's filledwith

no objections so far, from what I remember of this thread

we take an empty array, fill it and then it's "full"

Josef



>
>>
>> > How about `np.inited` ?  `full` doesn't sound quite right to me.
>> > Although I
>> > expect once it comes into use everyone will get used to it.
>>
>> Is this pronounce like "ignited" ?
>
>
> I guess ``__init__``-ed. Not very clear I'm afraid.
>
> Ralf
>
>> Josef
>> German speaker
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>