[Numpy-discussion] numpy.filled, again
Charles R Harris
charlesr.harris at gmail.com
Sat Jun 29 21:23:17 EDT 2013
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 7:15 PM, <josef.pktd at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:43 PM, <josef.pktd at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Charles R Harris
> >> <charlesr.harris at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> So this petered off...any objections to np.full?
> >
> >
> > No objection.
>
> full full full
>
> np.full full of what?
>
> full of the number it's filledwith
>
> no objections so far, from what I remember of this thread
>
> we take an empty array, fill it and then it's "full"
>
You mean "fulled"? ;)
<snip>
Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20130629/b295fdec/attachment.html>
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list