[Numpy-discussion] Interesting discussion on copyrighting files.
njs at pobox.com
Sat Oct 17 15:25:14 EDT 2015
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 10:24 AM, <josef.pktd at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Charles R Harris
> <charlesr.harris at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Worth a read at A&D.
> Thanks, it is worth a read.
> Most of the time when I see code copied from scipy or statsmodels, it is
> properly attributed.
> But every once in a while (like just now) I see code in an interesting
> sounding package on github where I start to recognize parts because they
> have my code comments still left in but don't have an attribution to the
> It's almost ok if it's MIT or BSD licensed because then I can "borrow back"
> the changes, but not if the new license is GPL.
I'm not sure I fully agree about the GPL thing (I understand and
sympathize with how annoying it is, but when we fight for BSD
licensing then what are we fighting for if not for the right of random
people to take our stuff and without letting us "borrow back"
changes?), but more importantly it should be noted:
People who take MIT/BSD licensed code and strip off the attribution
are actually violating the license. This is pretty much the only thing
you can do that violates the license, but they're doing it. Better
practice is to keep a list of places where code was taken from, and
the licenses governing its use, in your LICENSE.txt file:
Nathaniel J. Smith -- http://vorpus.org
More information about the NumPy-Discussion