[Numpy-discussion] Proposal: stop supporting 'setup.py install'; start requiring 'pip install .' instead
jni.soma at gmail.com
Tue Oct 27 02:53:09 EDT 2015
Is there a pip equivalent of "python setup.py develop"?
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 5:33 PM Charles R Harris <charlesr.harris at gmail.com>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:08 AM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Charles R Harris
>> <charlesr.harris at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I gave it a shot the other day. Pip keeps a record of the path to the
>> > and in order to cleanup I needed to search out the file and delete the
>> > path. There is probably a better way to do that, but it didn't strike
>> me as
>> > less troublesome than ` python setup.py install --local`.
>> Sorry, what did you "give a shot", and what problem did it create?
>> What does `setup.py install --local` do? (it doesn't seem to be
>> mentioned in `setup.py install --help`.)
> `pip install --user -e . `. However, `pip install --user .` seems to work
> fine. The pip documentation isn't the best.
> Yeah, `--user` not `--local`. It's getting late...
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion