[Numpy-discussion] Proposal: stop supporting 'setup.py install'; start requiring 'pip install .' instead

Nathaniel Smith njs at pobox.com
Tue Oct 27 03:31:09 EDT 2015

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Juan Nunez-Iglesias
<jni.soma at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there a pip equivalent of "python setup.py develop"?

Kinda answered this already when replying to Chuck, but: yes, it's
`pip install -e <path or URL or package name>` (the -e is short for
--editable), not that you would need it necessarily because `setup.py
develop` would still be legal.


Nathaniel J. Smith -- http://vorpus.org

More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list