[Numpy-discussion] Numpy set_printoptions, silent failure, bug?

[John Ladasky]

Hi Robert,

Thanks for your reply.  If no one disagrees with you or with me that this
is a Numpy bug, I would appreciate being directed to the appropriate page
to submit a bug-fix request.


On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Robert Kern <robert.kern at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:41 PM, John Ladasky <jladasky at itu.edu> wrote:
>
> > Should this be considered a Numpy bug, or is there some reason that
> set_printoptions would legitimately need to accept a dictionary as a single
> argument?
>
> There is no such reason. One could certainly add more validation to the
> arguments to np.set_printoptions().
>
> --
> Robert Kern
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>


-- 
*John J. Ladasky Jr., Ph.D.*
*Research Scientist*
*International Technological University*
*2711 N. First St, San Jose, CA 95134 USA*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20160719/50468bd9/attachment.html>