[Numpy-discussion] Removing priority labels from github

[Charles R Harris]

On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 2:10 PM Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 4:49 PM Stephan Hoyer <shoyer at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 2:22 AM Sebastian Berg <
>> sebastian at sipsolutions.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 11:02 +0300, Matti Picus wrote:
>>> > We currently have highest, high, normal, low, and lowest priority
>>> > labels
>>> > for github issues/PRs. At the recent status meeting, we proposed
>>> > consolidating these to a single "high" priority label. Anything
>>> > "low"
>>> > priority should be merged or closed since it will be quickly
>>> > forgotten,
>>> > and no "normal" tag is needed.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > With that, we (the BIDS team) would like to encourage reviewers to
>>> > use
>>> > the "high" priority tag to indicate things we should be working on.
>>> >
>>> > Any objections or thoughts?
>>> >
>>>
>>> Sounds like a plan, especially having practically meaningless tags
>>> right now is no help. Most of them are historical and personally I have
>>> only been using the milestones to tag things as high priority (very
>>> occasionally).
>>>
>>> - Sebastian
>>>
>>
>> +1 from me as well. I haven't been using these tags at all.
>>
>
> +1
>
>
+1 I may have used one of the priority labels once or twice, I don't really
remember. When I think something needs to be fixed or merged I generally
add a benchmark.

Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20181020/8d5c9796/attachment.html>