[pypy-dev] bootstrapping issues
holger krekel
hpk at trillke.net
Sun Jan 12 01:23:42 CET 2003
[Marc Recht Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 11:12:00PM +0100]
> >> There is the idea of not using make/configure/automake
> >> but a simple understandable debuggable (read: python based)
> >> build environment. IOW words the number of dependencies
> >> for building Minimal Python should also be minimal.
> >>
> > May I suggest scons (http://www.scons.org/)? It's what I would use in a
> > new project today.
> SCons is a really nice tool, but what about the good old makefile (+
> config.mk). We're talking about a small core and Python itself uses POSIX
> conforming source it shouldn't be that problem. And, SCons requires an
> installed Python. If an installed Python should be a requirement we could
> also try to use distutils (to have one dependency less).
Using CPython as a first means of bootstrapping should only be
there for the time beeing. It's simply practical to start with.
Eventually there should be a self-contained bootstrapping process.
IMO this hints at doing a very smallish VM which is able to drive
the build process to a point where the next-stage VM with more
features and a generic C-level interfacing could take over.
SCons is certainly worth checking out but it might already use
too many features of python to be used for initial bootstrapping.
I doubt that distutils would be of much use at early stages.
Eventually the requirement for CPython should go away. And once
Minimal Python is unwrapped we don't need a build environment
anymore :-)
regards,
holger
More information about the Pypy-dev
mailing list