Carl Friedrich Bolz
cfbolz at gmx.de
Tue Sep 27 17:15:43 CEST 2011
On 09/27/2011 05:03 PM, Andrew Francis wrote:
> >Sounds like a good idea to me. As long as any new or altered features
> >do not make it into what is labelled as an implementation of the
> >Stackless API without also being accepted into Stackless itself.
> Richard, in the long run, people will use whatever solves their problems
> and creates opportunities. I don't know about you but I'm interested in
> using PyPy and stackless.py to prototype new concurrency constructs that
> I want to use.... and in the process, throwing the prototypes out there
> to see what sticks.
Throwing a prototype out is not the same as giving the prototype a
semi-official blessing by packaging it with PyPy in the stackless
module. I agree with Richard.
More information about the pypy-dev