[pypy-dev] Killing OOType? (was Re: Translating pypy on FreeBSD with CLI backend)
jameslan at gmail.com
Wed May 22 08:11:30 CEST 2013
I really wish pypy is able to support jvm, cli and dalvik, so that it is
possible to write core business logic in python which runs everywhere.
Is there any plan to implement a better ootype as well as OO backends?
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Armin Rigo <arigo at tunes.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Antonio Cuni <anto.cuni at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Although I have an emotional feeling with that piece of code, I think
> > Alex is right.
> I also tend to agree. Killing stuff that nobody seriously cares about
> is sad but good, particularly when it adds some otherwise-unnecessary
> levels of abstractions everywhere. We should ideally wait e.g. one
> month for feedback from other developers that may still have plans
> And no, before someone asks, asmjs wouldn't need the OO backend but
> more likely hacks on top of the LL backend. The OO-vs-LL levels of
> abstractions are wrong there.
> A bientôt,
> pypy-dev mailing list
> pypy-dev at python.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the pypy-dev