[Python-3000] PEPs 3xxx status

[Guido van Rossum]

And it's in the p3yk branch, too.

The main reason these are all still drafts is that I expect that
implementing them may cause a certain amount of redesign, and in some
cases the spec isn't entirely clear. The "real" acceptance status (in
my head) is all over the map -- 3102 is obviously accepted, 3101
likely, 3103 unlikely, 3104 possibly, 3108 is too early to tell, and
the rest (3105, 06, 07, 09, 10) are accepted.

--Guido

On 2/17/07, Eduardo EdCrypt O. Padoan <eopadoan at altavix.com> wrote:
> On 2/17/07, Talin <talin at acm.org> wrote:
> > I don't know about the others, however I want to speak to the issue of
> > 3101 and 3102, since I wrote them - the main reason that those PEPs
> > haven't been accepted is that there's no sample implementation to
> > evaluate. (At least, I'm not aware of any implementation of them, unless
> > someone did it while I wasn't looking :)
>
> At least for 3102, yes, someone did:
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1549670&group_id=5470
>
> --
> EduardoOPadoan (eopadoan->altavix::com)
> Bookmarks: http://del.icio.us/edcrypt
> _______________________________________________
> Python-3000 mailing list
> Python-3000 at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/guido%40python.org
>


-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)