[Python-3000] PEPs 3xxx status
g.brandl at gmx.net
Sat Feb 17 19:42:52 CET 2007
Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> And it's in the p3yk branch, too.
> The main reason these are all still drafts is that I expect that
> implementing them may cause a certain amount of redesign, and in some
> cases the spec isn't entirely clear. The "real" acceptance status (in
> my head) is all over the map -- 3102 is obviously accepted, 3101
> likely, 3103 unlikely, 3104 possibly, 3108 is too early to tell, and
> the rest (3105, 06, 07, 09, 10) are accepted.
I updated the PEP index to reflect that.
More information about the Python-3000