[python-committers] An alternative governance model
aleax at google.com
Wed Jul 18 14:23:52 EDT 2018
Since 1179 (and with a few very minor exceptions in the centuries right
after then -- none since 1612), the Catholic Church requires a
super-majority of 2/3 to elect a new Pope. I don't see how the choice of a
BDFL is so much more important to the Python community, than the choice of
a Pope is to the Catholic Church; thus, requiring 90% rather than "just"
2/3 seems unwarranted.
In fact, a 90% requirement gets dangerously close to a requirement for
unanimity -- allowing any member of the Sejm to shout "Nie pozwalam!" and
thus end the session and nullify every decision made in the session. As
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberum_veto puts it, "Many historians hold
that the liberum veto was a major cause of the deterioration of the
Commonwealth political system" all the way to the partitions of Poland.
Let's steer well clear of this: those who cannot remember the past, etc,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:07 AM Łukasz Langa <lukasz at langa.pl> wrote:
> > On Jul 18, 2018, at 11:54 AM, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote:
> > Are you saying that we should use some method besides voting, or that a
> higher percentage of yea votes is required? If the latter, I have no
> problem with 66% or 75%.
> The cleanest way would be for Guido to choose but he already said he wants
> to stay out of the process.
> With that in mind, one alternative is for the President of the PSF to
> choose ;-)
> ...so realistically the only alternative is a vote. Given the gravity of
> the situation (a decision on how future decisions are made; long-term
> consequences), I propose:
> 1. Define a committer as anybody with GitHub privileges. While not
> everybody on this mailing list decided to get GitHub credentials, they can
> do it at any point. At the same time, by defining the committer set as
> GitHub contributors, we solve the issue of inactive contributors. And this
> is important because...
> 2. Require 90% participation for the vote to be valid.
> 3. Require 90% votes in favor for the proposal to pass.
> If 2. or 3. fail, back to the drawing board. I'd lower those requirements
> only after a few consecutive votes fail.
> - Ł
> python-committers mailing list
> python-committers at python.org
> Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the python-committers