[python-committers] discuss.python.org participation

[Brett Cannon]

One data point in all of this is Victor's PEP 8015. Here on the mailing
list I seem to be the first and only person to reply since the PEP was
posted on Monday. But over on Discourse there have been 3 people who have
replied and there's already been some back-and-forth.

So with a sample size of one, it looks like Discourse isn't discouraging
anyone, otherwise I would have assumed people who don't want to start with
Discourse would have simply started a discussion here on the mailing list
about Victor's PEP.

On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 20:24, Jack Diederich <jackdied at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm worried about the new format combined with governance discussions. As
> best I can tell 51 CPython committers have signed up for an account [I
> think that is a big number, btw] but only 17 have posted anything; That 17
> is about 5 more people than put their name on a governance PEP. And maybe 5
> people have half the total posts. This does not feel like a discussion at
> all.
>
> I don't think it was deliberate, but it looks like the new format is
> actively discouraging everyone but those most deeply invested with the most
> free time from participating.
>
> -Jack
> _______________________________________________
> python-committers mailing list
> python-committers at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
> Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20181012/b1cd0027/attachment.html>