[Python-Dev] Re: [Python-Dev] Re: String methods... finally
gstein at lyra.org
Tue Jun 15 12:01:09 CEST 1999
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> if (1) is a reasonable solution (I think it is), I think the
> answer to (2) should be no, based on the rule of least
> surprise. Python has always required me to explicitly
> state when I want to convert things in a way that may
> radically change their meaning. I see little reason to
> abandon that in 1.6.
Especially because it is such a simple translation:
Very obvious what is happening. It isn't hard to read, and it doesn't
take a lot out of a person to insert that extra phrase.
And hey... people can always do:
def strjoin(sep, seq):
return sep.join(map(str, seq))
And just use strjoin() everywhere if they hate the typing.
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
More information about the Python-Dev