[Python-Dev] ascii default encoding
Sun, 16 Jul 2000 15:09:25 -0700
Thomas is quite correct. "Deprecated" is the proper term.
On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 11:42:29PM +0200, Thomas Wouters wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 11:34:00PM +0200, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> > "Depreciated" means that you should not use it in new code --
> > perhaps someday string.py will disappear, even though I doubt
> > that.
> The common term for that is 'deprecated', not 'depreciated'. Really :) There
> once was someone who posted a patch to linux-kernel to fix all those bloody
> typos everyone made. Almost all instances of 'depreciated' where spelled
> 'deprecated' ! <wink>
> 1.To express disapproval of; deplore.
> 2.To belittle; depreciate.
> Deprecate \Dep"re*cate\:
> To pray against, as an evil; to seek to avert by prayer; to desire the
> removal of; to seek deliverance from; to express deep regret for; to
> disapprove of strongly.
> The difference is minor, but there really is one. Come on Eric, show us the
> hackers dictionary on this ;)
> > > Besides, 'string.join' is a good compromise for the people who
> > > don't like " ".join()
> > Tim Peters will have to take the blame for this one ;-) I don't
> > find delimiter.join(sequence) awkward or funny -- using methods
> > for this has added value: it defines an interface which other
> > objects could support as well and thus makes your code polymorph.
> Indeed. And is there any harm in providing conveniency functions for those
> that prefer more obvious code ? There is hardly any doubt what
> string.join(s, sep)
> does. And some people prefer it that way. They don't care that it's really
> 'return sep.join(s)' behind their backs.
> Thomas Wouters <email@example.com>
> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
> Python-Dev mailing list
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/