[Python-Dev] String encoding
M.-A. Lemburg
mal@lemburg.com
Thu, 25 May 2000 14:22:09 +0200
Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 May 2000, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> > > one might of course the system encoding if the user actually calls setlocale,
> >
> > I think that was supposed to be:
> >
> > one might of course SET the system encoding ONLY if the user actually calls setlocale,
> >
> > or something...
>
> Bleh. Global switches are bogus. Since you can't depend on the setting,
> and you can't change it (for fear of busting something else),
Sure you can: in site.py before any other code using Unicode
gets executed.
> then you
> have to be explicit about your encoding all the time. Since you're never
> going to rely on a global encoding, then why keep it?
For the same reason you use setlocale() in C (and Python): to
make programs portable to other locales without too much
fuzz.
> This global encoding (per thread or not) just reminds me of the single
> hook for import, all over again.
Think of it as a configuration switch which is made settable
via a Python interface -- much like the optimize switch or
the debug switch (which are settable via Python APIs in mxTools).
The per-thread implementation is mainly a design question: I
think globals should always be implemented on a per-thread basis.
Hmm, I wish Guido would comment on the idea of keeping the
runtime settable encoding...
--
Marc-Andre Lemburg
______________________________________________________________________
Business: http://www.lemburg.com/
Python Pages: http://www.lemburg.com/python/