[Python-Dev] Terminology question
Greg Ward
gward@python.net
Thu, 25 May 2000 18:33:54 -0400
A question of terminology: frequently in the Distutils docs I need to
refer to the package-that-is-not-a-package, ie. the "root" or "empty"
package. I can't decide if I prefer "root package", "empty package" or
what. ("Empty" just means the *name* is empty, so it's probably not a
very good thing to say "empty package" -- but "package with no name" or
"unnamed package" aren't much better.)
Is there some accepted convention that I have missed?
Here's the definition I've just written for the "Distribution Python
Modules" manual:
\item[root package] the ``package'' that modules not in a package live
in. The vast majority of the standard library is in the root package,
as are many small, standalone third-party modules that don't belong to
a larger module collection. (The root package isn't really a package,
since it doesn't have an \file{\_\_init\_\_.py} file. But we have to
call it something.)
Confusing enough? I thought so...
Greg
--
Greg Ward - Unix nerd gward@python.net
http://starship.python.net/~gward/
Beware of altruism. It is based on self-deception, the root of all evil.