[Python-Dev] number-sig anyone?

[m@moshez.org]

On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 17:30:52 -0400, Guido van Rossum <guido@digicool.com> wrote:

> Sounds like a good plan, but please wait until we have a SIG
> owner/moderator and a charter.  Without both of these a SIG will be a
> failure.

If we do have a number-sig, I suppose python-numberics@sf.net should
die and merge into that, right?
I am all for that, but I won't be volunteering to be the champion...
I've learned my lesson about spreading myself too thin.
-- 
gpg --keyserver keyserver.pgp.com --recv-keys 46D01BD6 54C4E1FE
Secure (inaccessible): 4BD1 7705 EEC0 260A 7F21  4817 C7FC A636 46D0 1BD6
Insecure (accessible): C5A5 A8FA CA39 AB03 10B8  F116 1713 1BCF 54C4 E1FE
Learn Python! http://www.ibiblio.org/obp/thinkCSpy