[Python-Dev] PEP 218 (sets); moving set.py to Lib
Michael Hudson
mwh@python.net
20 Aug 2002 18:25:13 +0100
Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> writes:
> I am still perplexed that I receoved *no* feedback on the sets module
> except on this issue of sort order (which I consider solved by adding
> a method _repr() that takes an optional 'sorted' argument).
This is hardly without precedent, though, is it? (I mean the only
getting feedback on trivia).
I haven't looked at the set implementationin detail, but given that
it's principal authors are you and Alex, I'm sure it must be
wonderful. Is that better? :)
Cheers,
M.
--
Or here's an even simpler indicator of how much C++ sucks: Print
out the C++ Public Review Document. Have someone hold it about
three feet above your head and then drop it. Thus you will be
enlightened. -- Thant Tessman