[Python-Dev] tiny optimization in ceval mainloop

Michael Hudson mwh@python.net
30 Aug 2002 17:13:14 +0100

"Steve Holden" <sholden@holdenweb.com> writes:

> > A bunch of 0.5% improvements add up.  If there's not much cost in
> > complexity, why not go for it?
> >
> Yeah, right, we just need 200 of them and we're laughing. Computation in
> infinitesimal time.

Multiply up doesn't have the same ring to it, does it?


  I don't have any special knowledge of all this. In fact, I made all
  the above up, in the hope that it corresponds to reality.
                                            -- Mark Carroll, ucam.chat