[Python-Dev] tiny optimization in ceval mainloop
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 11:50:52 -0400
>>>>> "SH" == Steve Holden <email@example.com> writes:
>> Jeremy Hylton <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> > The difference I saw with only the ticker check in ceval was
>> > only about 1% for pystone. Python was always faster with the
>> > change, but never by much.
>> A bunch of 0.5% improvements add up. If there's not much cost in
>> complexity, why not go for it?
SH> Yeah, right, we just need 200 of them and we're
SH> laughing. Computation in infinitesimal time.
I think Xeno's laughing already.