[Python-Dev] new features for 2.3?
Guido van Rossum
guido@python.org
Tue, 07 Jan 2003 08:12:54 -0500
> >>> Maybe it could become a standard library module?
> >>
> >> That would be great. But could it be a bit premature?
> > [...]
> >> Maybe I'm just being too protective of "my baby". Perhaps it's time
> >> for it to face the realities of the big bad world.
> >
> > Maybe. Maybe I haven't been following reST closely enough. I do
> > admit that I was a bit worried when I saw how rough the tools are
> > (e.g. tools/html.py, which is the only thing I've used)
>
> In what way are the tools rough?
Well, they aren't even installed.
> Other than:
>
> > and also when I found that at first they didn't work with
> > Python 2.3 at all.
>
> Minor issues, all fixed now.
Yeah, everything's a minor issue of programming. :-)
> > OTOH, maybe this will be an encouragement for you and the other reST
> > developers (are there any besides you? :-)
>
> But of course! There are many, contributing a little bit here & there.
> A few have contributed significant amounts. But it's mostly me, true.
For a project of this size, that's often a good idea, as long as the
main developer listens to the users (which you do). So congratulations!
> > to aim for a release beyond the CVS snapshot. Once you've released
> > it may make more sense to add it to Python 2.3.
>
> I don't think that Docutils itself is ready. Autodocumenting Python source,
> what I consider to be its main use case, isn't addressed yet. I've been
> aiming at another release when that's ready.
>
> I think the reStructuredText parser (with the one exception of interpreted
> text) is mature and ready though. I'd be happy to help integrate that.
Hm, I'd rather do a package deal than piecemeal. Let's forget this
until you feel you're truly ready.
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)