[Python-Dev] Last chance!
Christian Tismer
tismer at stackless.com
Mon Mar 29 13:15:32 EST 2004
Nick Bastin wrote:
>
> On Mar 29, 2004, at 10:23 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>> Since the profiler is being invoked from the thread being profiled,
>> how could it end up not being in the same thread?
>>
>> (If I am missing something, I must be missing a *lot* about your
>> design, so you might want to say quite a bit more on how it works.)
>
>
> ...previous reply to this email deleted after some testing...
>
> Nevermind, the specific situation that I was concerned about actually
> can't occur. I wasn't sure that I could make a guarantee that the
> profiler would be invoked from the same thread as the code being
> profiled in all cases of thread destruction, but that appears to be an
> unwarranted concern.
You are the first person since months who claimed a possible
use of f_tstate. Please make sure that you really don't
need it.
It needs to be changed, anyway: Either it must be updated for
generators for every run, or it should be dropped.
cheers - chris
--
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer at stackless.com>
Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14109 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
work +49 30 89 09 53 34 home +49 30 802 86 56 mobile +49 173 24 18 776
PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list