[Python-Dev] Tests broken on Windows

[Hye-Shik Chang]

On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 01:50:29 -0500, Raymond Hettinger <python at rcn.com> wrote:
> For the time being, I think it would be best to use sleep() instead of
> utime().  While it costs three seconds, at least we know it to be a
> platform independent test.  It is rather late in the game to be
> debugging OS specific problems introduced by a new check-in.

Okay.  I am convinced about using sleep() always.  And two seconds
will be enough to wait for new timestamp value. :)  Will check it
in right now.

Hye-Shik