[Python-Dev] Patches
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Wed Oct 20 05:56:39 CEST 2004
>>>>> "Martin" == Martin v Löwis <martin at v.loewis.de> writes:
Martin> I have suggested a procedure in the past, which never has
Martin> been executed so far. I promise that I will stick to it if
Martin> somebody actually executes it. Here it goes:
Martin> - For every patch you want to get reviewed, review 10
Martin> (ten) other patches.
I think 10 is way too high; I would call it prohibitive for anyone who
isn't already primarily a Python hacker.
I agree it should be more than 1 for 1 for several reasons, but I'd be
willing to bet you get excellent results from 3:1 or even 2:1. Even
if you think that risks being a burden on your time, since you've had
no takers yet (and it's been a while since the last time I saw your
proposal), I'd say that lowering the "price" to 5:1 is a reasonable
idea, and not very risky. You can always raise the price again if you
get 50 useful reviews by next Tuesday.<wink>
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list