[Python-Dev] license issues with profiler.py and md5.h/md5c.c
bob at redivi.com
Sat Feb 12 02:38:18 CET 2005
On Feb 11, 2005, at 6:11 PM, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> G'day again,
> From: "Gregory P. Smith" <greg at electricrain.com>
>>> I think it would be cleaner and simpler to modify the existing
>>> md5module.c to use the openssl md5 layer API (this is just a
>>> search/replace to change the function names). The bigger problem is
>>> deciding what/how/whether to include the openssl md5 implementation
>>> sources so that win32 can use them.
>> yes, that is all i was suggesting.
>> win32 python is already linked against openssl for the socket module
>> ssl support, having the md5 and sha1 modules depend on openssl should
>> not cause a problem.
> IANAL... I have too much common sense, so I won't argue licences :-)
> So is openssl already included in the Python sources, or is it just a
> dependency? I had a quick look and couldn't find it so it must be a
> Given that Python is already dependant on openssl, it makes sense to
> md5sum to use it. I have a feeling that openssl internally uses md5,
> so this
> way we wont link against two different md5sum implementations.
It is an optional dependency that is used when present (read: not just
win32). The sources are not included with Python.
OpenSSL does internally have an implementation of md5 (and sha1, among
More information about the Python-Dev