[Python-Dev] idea for data-type (data-format) PEP
theller at ctypes.org
Thu Nov 2 21:15:19 CET 2006
Travis E. Oliphant schrieb:
> Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
>> Thanks for all the comments that have been given on the data-type
>> (data-format) PEP. I'd like opinions on an idea for revising the PEP I
>> 1) We could define a special string-syntax (or list syntax) that covers
>> every special case. The array interface specification goes this
>> direction and it requires no new Python types. This could also be seen
>> as an extension of the "struct" module to allow for nested structures, etc.
>> 2) We could define a Python object that specifically carries data-format
>> Does that explain the goal of what I'm trying to do better?
> In other-words, what I'm saying is I really want a PEP that does this.
> Could we have a discussion about what the best way to communicate
> data-format information across multiple extension modules would look
> like. I'm not saying my (pre-)PEP is best. The point of putting it in
> it's infant state out there is to get the discussion rolling, not to
> claim I've got all the answers.
IIUC, so far the 'data-object' carries information about the structure
of the data it describes.
Couldn't it go a step further and have also some functionality?
Converting the data into a Python object and back?
This is what the ctypes SETFUNC and GETFUNC functions do, and what
also is implemented in the struct module...
More information about the Python-Dev