[Python-Dev] Changing all network-oriented tests to facilitate (virtually unlimited) parallel test execution [Issue#: 2550]

Trent Nelson tnelson at onresolve.com
Wed Apr 9 02:01:26 CEST 2008

Committed the patch in r62234.  Hopefully the work paid off!  (He says moments before all the buildbots turn red...)

From: Gregory P. Smith [mailto:greg at krypto.org]
Sent: 08 April 2008 20:58
To: Trent Nelson
Cc: python-dev at python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Changing all network-oriented tests to facilitate (virtually unlimited) parallel test execution [Issue#: 2550]

On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Trent Nelson <tnelson at onresolve.com<mailto:tnelson at onresolve.com>> wrote:

I've forwarding my most recent update to issue 2550 here such that the proposed patch (and in general, the approach to network-oriented test cases) can be vetted by a wider audience:


This patch works towards fixing a large proportion of the tests that were written in such a way that often leads to buildbot errors when port conflicts arise.  With this patch applied, I can run many instances of the test suite in parallel and none of the network-oriented tests fail (which they do currently if you try and do this).

Plenty of discussion (mostly me replying to my own comments) on the subject at: http://bugs.python.org/issue2550.

Anyone have any issues with this new approach?  I'm particularily interested in whether or not people disagree with the assumption I've drawn regarding never using SO_REUSEADDR in tests for TCP/IP sockets (see below).


I think your assumptions are fair.

Note that not using SO_REUSEADDR can reserve the port for a few minutes beyond the actual unbinding destruction of the server socket on some OSes but with tens of thousands of ports available and likely not more than 1-200 being needed by a full test suite run and how long the test suite takes to run I think that is acceptable and is not a problem we're likely to ever run into (fix it only iffwe ever do).


From: python-bugs-list-bounces+tnelson=onresolve.com at python.org<mailto:onresolve.com at python.org> [python-bugs-list-bounces+tnelson=onresolve.com at python.org<mailto:onresolve.com at python.org>] On Behalf Of Trent Nelson [report at bugs.python.org<mailto:report at bugs.python.org>]
Sent: 08 April 2008 12:49
To: python-bugs-list at python.org<mailto:python-bugs-list at python.org>
Subject: [issue2550] SO_REUSEADDR doesn't have the same semantics on Windows    as on Unix

Trent Nelson <tnelson at onresolve.com<mailto:tnelson at onresolve.com>> added the comment:

Invested quite a few cycles on this issue last night.  The more time I
spent on it, the more I became convinced that every single test working
with sockets should be changed in one fell swoop in order to facilitate
(virtually unlimited) parallel test execution without fear of port

I've attached a second patch, trunk.2550-2.patch, which is my progress
so far on doing just this.  The main changes can be expressed by the
following two points:

a) do whatever it takes in network-oriented tests to ensure
  unique ports are obtained (relying on the bind_port() and
  find_unused_port() methods exposed by test_support)

b) never, ever, ever call SO_REUSEADDR on a socket from a test;
  because we're putting so much effort into obtaining a unique
  port, this should never be necessary -- in the rare cases that
  our attempts to obtain a unique port fail, then we absolutely
  should fail with EADDRINUSE, as the ability to obtain a unique
  port for the duration of a client/server test is an invariant
  that we *must* be able to depend upon.  If the invariant is
  broken, fail immediately (don't mask the problem with

With this patch applied, I can spawn a handful of Python processes and
run the entire test suite (without -r, ensuring all tests are run in
the same order, which should encourage port conflicts (if there were
any)) without any errors*.  Doing that now is completely and utterly

[*] Well, almost without error.  All the I/O related tests that try and
open @test fail.

I believe there's still outstanding work to do with this patch with
regards to how the intracacies of SO_REUSEADDR and SO_EXCLUSIVEADDRUSE
should be handled in the rest of the stdlib.  I'm still thinking about
the best approach for this.  However, the patch as it currently stands
is still quite substantial so I wanted to get it out sooner rather than
later for review.

(I'll forward this to python-dev@ to try and encourage more eyes from
people with far more network-fu than I.)

Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9980/trunk.2550-2.patch

Tracker <report at bugs.python.org<mailto:report at bugs.python.org>>
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/tnelson%40onresolve.com
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev at python.org<mailto:Python-Dev at python.org>
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/greg%40krypto.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20080408/253b6341/attachment.htm 

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list