[Python-Dev] Proposed unittest changes
ben+python at benfinney.id.au
Thu Jul 17 07:10:38 CEST 2008
"Steven D'Aprano" <steve at pearwood.info> writes:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:26:45 am Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> > From: "Ben Finney" <ben+python at benfinney.id.au>
> > > Right, so I'm putting up a separate PEP just for the renaming.
> > > Should be arriving on this list soon.
> > I would like to work with you or someone else who is interested
> > on an alternative PEP for a separate, simpler test module
> > using the py.test syntax.
> I am interested in this suggestion. I didn't know about py.test.
> I admit to dissatisfaction with unittest (too Java-ish and heavyweight
> for my tastes). I would love a test suite midway in weight between
> doctests and unittest, so I will check it out.
I still think 'nose' is a better candidate for this: it appears to
offer what people say they want from 'py.test', yet (unlike 'py.test')
is integrated well with 'unittest'.
\ “Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?” “I think so, |
`\ Brain, but what kind of rides do they have in Fabioland?” |
_o__) —_Pinky and The Brain_ |
More information about the Python-Dev