[Python-Dev] Improved thread switching
jnoller at gmail.com
Thu Mar 20 18:45:37 CET 2008
Even I, as a strong advocate for it's inclusion think I should finish
the PEP and outline all of the questions/issues that may come out of
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Facundo Batista
<facundobatista at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2008/3/20, Andrew McNabb <amcnabb at mcnabbs.org>:
> > Since we officially encourage people to spawn processes instead of
> > threads, I think that this would be a great idea. The processing module
> > has a similar API to threading. It's easy to use, works well, and most
> > importantly, gives us some place to point people to when they complain
> > about the GIL.
> I'm +1 to include the processing module in the stdlib.
> just avoid confussions, with these libraries with alike names, I'm
> meaning this  module, the one that emulates the semantics of
> threading module.
> Does anybody has strong reasons for this module to not get included?
>  http://pypi.python.org/pypi/processing
> . Facundo
> Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/
> PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/jnoller%40gmail.com
More information about the Python-Dev