[Python-Dev] [Python-3000] Proposed revised schedule

Georg Brandl g.brandl at gmx.net
Tue Sep 9 09:22:34 CEST 2008


Guido van Rossum schrieb:

>>> Perhaps it's time to separate the 2.6 and 3.0 release schedules? I
>>> don't care if the next version of OSX contains 3.0 or not -- but I do
>>> care about it having 2.6.
>>
>> I'm not really sure what good that would do us unless we wanted to
>> bring 3.0 back to the beta phase and continue to work on some larger
>> issues with it. I also suspect doing two separate, but close together
>> final releases would be more stressful than having them in lock and
>> step.
> 
> Well, from the number of release blockers it sounds like another 3.0
> beta is the right thing. For 2.6 however I believe we're much closer
> to the finish line -- there aren't all those bytes/str issues to clean
> up, for example! And apparently the benefit of releasing on schedule
> is that we will be included in OSX. That's a much bigger deal for 2.6
> than for 3.0 (I doubt that Apple would add two versions anyway).

Even if I can't contribute very much at the moment, I'm still +1 to that.
I doubt Python would get nice publicity if we released a 3.0 but had to
tell everyone, "but don't really use it yet, it may still contain any
number of showstoppers."

>> Just my pocket change, though.

I'm suspecting this is much more than $0.02 :D

Georg


-- 
Thus spake the Lord: Thou shalt indent with four spaces. No more, no less.
Four shall be the number of spaces thou shalt indent, and the number of thy
indenting shall be four. Eight shalt thou not indent, nor either indent thou
two, excepting that thou then proceed to four. Tabs are right out.



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list