[Python-Dev] 2.7 Release? 2.7 == last of the 2.x line?
Brett Cannon
brett at python.org
Tue Nov 3 20:53:02 CET 2009
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 05:40, David Cournapeau <cournape at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Then clearly we can't back port features.
>>
>> I'd like to read some case studies of people who have migrated applications
>> from 2.6 to 3.0.
>
> +1, especially for packages which have a lot of C code: the current
> documentation is sparse :) The only helpful reference I have found so
> far is an email by MvL concerning psycopg2 port.
There used to be a page on the wiki of case studies, but I couldn't
find it. But one C-specific case study is the port of Wing's extension
modules to support from Python 2.0 to 3.0:
http://pythonology.blogspot.com/2009/02/making-code-run-on-python-20-through-30.html
. There is also a wiki pages explicitly about porting C code:
http://wiki.python.org/moin/cporting and
http://wiki.python.org/moin/Py3kExtensionModules . Those latter pages
include links to the official porting docs:
http://docs.python.org/3.1/howto/cporting.html .
And as Georg pointed out there is always the python-porting mailing
list: http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-porting .
I'm afraid there is some FUD going around here, which is
understandable since no one wants to burn a ton of time on something
that will be difficult or take a lot of time. But I have not heard
anyone in this email thread (or anywhere for that matter) say that
they tried a port in earnest and it turned out to be difficult.
-Brett
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list