[Python-Dev] Platform extension for distutils on other interpreters than CPython
fijall at gmail.com
Tue Feb 23 20:44:21 CET 2010
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I would like to have a feature on platform module (or sys or
>>> somewhere) that can tell distutils or distutils2 that this platform
>>> (be it PyPy or Jython) is not able to compile any C module. The
>>> purpose of this is to make distutils bail out in more reasonable
>>> manner than a compilation error in case this module is not going to
>>> work on anything but CPython.
>>> What do you think?
>> I think we could have a global variable in sys, called "dont_compile",
>> distutils would look at
>> before it tris to compile stuff, exactly like how it does for pyc file
> Or... wait : we already know if we are using CPython, or Jython
> reading sys.platform.
> So I could simply not trigger the compilation in case sys.platform is
> one of the CPythons
> and keep in distutils side a list of the platform names, Extension is
> incompatible with.
> That makes me wonder : why don't we have a sys.implementation variable ?
> (cython/jython/pypi), since we can have several values for cython in
That's pypy. pypi is something else. sys.platform is not any good,
since for example PyPy, and possibly any other python implementation
that is not CPython, but it's not tied to any particular platform
(like parrot) would say "linux2" or "win32".
sys.implementation sounds good, but it'll also require a list in
stdlib what's fine and what's not fine and a flag sounds like
something that everyone can set, not asking to be listed in stdlib.
How about sys.implementation.supports_extensions?
More information about the Python-Dev