[Python-Dev] A new warning category?
brett at python.org
Fri Oct 15 19:23:11 CEST 2010
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 03:27, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Michael Foord
> <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> wrote:
>> On 15/10/2010 08:22, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>>> Brett Cannon writes:
>>> > As one of the co-authors of the PEP I say no.
>>> Procedural question: Doesn't authorship disqualify you from BDF1P, so
>>> you can't pronounce?
>> I think Brett meant co-authorship of the *moratorium* PEP (which is already
> That's the way I took it as well.
And that is the way to take it. =)
> The other factor here is that the moratorium was largely to help other
> implementations get back up to speed with CPython as they dealt with
> the transition to 3.x. Adding a new warning type isn't the kind of
> moving target that something like PEP 380 would be.
Exactly. This is especially true if the other VMs use warnings.py
which will take care of all the details for them.
> Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org
More information about the Python-Dev