[Python-Dev] Are these PEP complete?: 389, 391, 3108, 3135
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Mon Feb 21 18:20:48 CET 2011
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> As the subject line asks, is there anything preventing the following
> PEPs from being marked Final?
>
> SA 389 argparse - New Command Line Parsing Module Bethard
> SA 391 Dictionary-Based Configuration For Logging Sajip
> SA 3108 Standard Library Reorganization Cannon
> SA 3121 Extension Module Initialization and Finalization von Löwis
> SA 3135 New Super
> Spealman, Delaney, Ryan
Somebody (not me, not necessarily the same person for each PEP) needs
to check each of these PEPs for how well they match the implemented
reality and report back here. (Unless you already did this and are
basically giving them a certificate of correctness with your post?)
> (I deliberately left 3118 off the list, since there are some
> discrepancies between the PEP and the implementation that need to be
> clarified for 3.3 and the 3 distutils related PEPs won't be done until
> Tarek merges distutils2 back into the main line of development)
>
> It would be good to clear the decks before new PEPs start to be
> accepted for inclusion in 3.3.
Why?
--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list