[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Disabling a test that fails on some bots. Will investigate the failure soon
eliben at gmail.com
Fri Feb 17 04:57:05 CET 2012
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 05:50, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:09 AM, eli.bendersky
> <python-checkins at python.org> wrote:
> > diff --git a/Lib/test/test_xml_etree_c.py b/Lib/test/test_xml_etree_c.py
> > --- a/Lib/test/test_xml_etree_c.py
> > +++ b/Lib/test/test_xml_etree_c.py
> > @@ -53,8 +53,8 @@
> > # actual class. In the Python version it's a class.
> > self.assertNotIsInstance(cET.Element, type)
> > - def test_correct_import_cET_alias(self):
> > - self.assertNotIsInstance(cET_alias.Element, type)
> > + #def test_correct_import_cET_alias(self):
> > + #self.assertNotIsInstance(cET_alias.Element, type)
> While this one was fixed quickly, *please* don't comment tests out
> without some kind of explanation in the code (not just in the checkin
> Even better is to use the expected_failure() decorator or the skip()
I just saw this test failing in some bots and wanted to fix it ASAP,
without spending time on a real investigation. The follow-up fix came less
than 2 hours later. But yes, I agree that commenting out wasn't a good
choice - I should've just deleted it for the time I was working on a fix.
By the way, I later discussed the failing test with Florent and
http://bugs.python.org/issue14035 is the result. That failure had made no
sense until Florent got deeper into import_fresh_module.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Python-Dev