[Python-Dev] PEP 413: Faster evolution of the Python Standard Library
Brett Cannon
brett at python.org
Sat Feb 25 03:53:26 CET 2012
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 21:08, Matt Joiner <anacrolix at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think every minor release should be fully supported. The current rate of
> change is very high and there's a huge burden on implementers and
> production users to keep up, so much so that upgrading is undesirable
> except for serious enthusiasts.
>
> Include just the basics and CPython specific modules in the core release
> and version the stdlib separately. The stdlib should be supported such that
> it can be installed to an arbitrary version of Python.
>
That idea has been put forth and shot down. The stdlib has to be tied to at
least some version of Python just like any other project. Plus the stdlib
is where we try out new language features to make sure they make sense.
Making it a separate project is not that feasible.
> Better yet I'd like to see the stdlib become a list of vetted external
> libraries that meet some requirements on usefulness, stability and
> compatibility (PEP), that get cut at regular intervals. This takes the
> burden away from core, improves innovation, allows for different
> implementations, and ensures that the Python package management system is
> actually useful.
>
That's been called a sumo release and proposed before, but no one has taken
the time to do it (although the 3rd-party releases of Python somewhat take
this view). Thinning out the stdlib in favour of the community providing
solutions is another can of worms which does not directly impact the
discussion of how to handle stdlib releases unless you are pushing to
simply drop the stdlib which is not possible as Python itself depends on it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120224/92ad7eb0/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list