[Python-Dev] Making sure dictionary adds/deletes during iteration always raise exception
Max Moroz
maxmoroz at gmail.com
Tue Dec 13 04:51:08 EST 2016
Would it be worth ensuring that an exception is ALWAYS raised if a key
is added to or deleted from a dictionary during iteration?
Currently, dict.__iter__ only raises "RuntimeError" when "dictionary
changed size during iteration". I managed to add 1 key and delete 1
key from the dictionary in the same iteration of the loop (the code
was in a callback function invoked in the loop) - of course without
any exception. (I hope I'm right in assuming that adding and deleting
entries in the loop is unsafe whether or not number of adds equals
number of deletes.)
I suspect the cost of a more comprehensive error reporting is not
worth the benefit, but I thought I'd ask anyway.
Here's a pure python prototype that would always raise on unsafe
add/delete. The main cost is the addition of a counter keeping track
of the number of modifications made to the dictionary (the work done
inside __iter__ is probably not adding any runtime cost because it
replaces roughly equivalent code that currently verifies that the
length didn't change):
class SafeKeyIter:
def __init__(self, iterator, container):
self.iterator = iterator
self.container = container
try:
self.n_modifications = container.n_modifications
except AttributeError:
raise RuntimeError('container does not support safe iteration')
def __next__(self):
if self.n_modifications != self.container.n_modifications:
raise RuntimeError('container entries added or deleted
during iteration')
return next(self.iterator)
class SafeView:
def __init__(self, view, container):
self.view = view
self.container = container
def __iter__(self):
return SafeKeyIter(self.view.__iter__(), self.container)
class SafeDict(dict):
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
self.n_modifications = 0
super().__init__(*args, **kwargs)
def __setitem__(self, key, value):
if key not in self:
self.n_modifications += 1
super().__setitem__(key, value)
def __delitem__(self, key):
self.n_modifications += 1
super().__delitem__(key)
def __iter__(self):
return SafeKeyIter(super().__iter__(), self)
def keys(self):
return SafeView(super().keys(), self)
def values(self):
return SafeView(super().values(), self)
def items(self):
return SafeView(super().items(), self)
# this raises RuntimeError:
d = SafeDict({1: 2})
for k in d:
d[k * 100] = 100
del d[k]
# while it wouldn't raise for a built-in dict
d = {1: 2}
for k in d:
d[k * 100] = 100
del d[k]
There was a brief discussion on SO after I asked a question about this
behavior, and later answered it:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/40955786/why-modifying-dict-during-iteration-doesnt-always-raise-exception.
Max
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list