[Python-Dev] Python should be easily compilable on Windows with MinGW

[Alexander Walters]

The 9 gig initial download is not the only problem.  Visual studio is 
very bandwidth hungry in day to day operations (between polling websites 
and vcs remotes, near constant updating, integration with the VS web 
service, etc.).  You can of course shut all of that off, but it's a 
pain.  It's my understanding from Steve's post that a leaner, meaner 
edition of VS is in the works, so waiting for that might just be an 
overall better solution.

On 2/27/2016 16:27, Franklin? Lee wrote:
>
> For this particular case, is there someone generous enough (or, can 
> someone apply for a PSF grant) to ship Mathieu a DVD/two/flash drive?
>
> On Feb 26, 2016 12:18 PM, "Mathieu Dupuy" <deronnax at gmail.com 
> <mailto:deronnax at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi.
>     I am currently working on adding some functionality on a standard
>     library module (http://bugs.python.org/issue15873). The Python part
>     went fine, but now I have to do the C counterpart, and I have ran into
>     in several problems, which, stacked up, are a huge obstacle to easily
>     contribute further. Currently, despite I could work, I can't go
>     further
>     on my patch.
>
>     I am currently working in very limited network, CPU and time
>     ressources* which are quite uncommon in the western world, but are
>     much less in the rest of the world. I have a 2GB/month mobile data
>     plan and a 100KB/s speed. For the C part of my patch, I should
>     download Visual Studio. The Express Edition 2015 is roughly 9GB. I
>     can't afford that.
>
>     I downloaded Virtualbox and two Linux netinstall (Ubuntu 15.10 and
>     Fedora 23). Shortly, I couldn't get something working quickly and
>     simply (quickly = less than 2 hours, downloading time NOT included,
>     which is anyway way too already much). What went wrong and why it went
>     wrong could be a whole new thread and is outside of the scope of this
>     message.
>     Let me precise this : at my work I use many virtualbox instances
>     automatically fired and run in parallel to test new deployments and
>     run unittests. I like this tool,
>     but despite its simple look, it (most of the time) can not be used
>     simply by a profane. The concepts it requires you to understand are
>     not intuitive at first sight and there is *always* a thing that go
>     wrong (guest additions, mostly).(for example : Ubuntu and Virtualbox
>     shipped for a moment a broken version of mount.vboxsf, preventing
>     sharing folder to mount. Despite it's fixed, the broken releases
>     spread everywhere and you may encounter them a lot in various Ubuntu
>     and Virtualbox version. I downloaded the last versions of both and I
>     am yet infected. https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/12879). I could do
>     whole new thread on why you can't ask newcomers to use Virtualbox
>     (currently, at least).
>
>     I ran into is a whole patch set to make CPython compile on MinGW
>     (https://bugs.python.org/issue3871#msg199695). But it is not denying
>     it's very experimental, and I know I would again spent useless hours
>     trying to get it work rather than joyfully improving Python, and
>     that's exactly what I do not want to happen.
>
>     Getting ready to contribute to CPython pure python modules from an
>     standard, average mr-everyone Windows PC for a beginner-to-medium
>     contributor only require few megabytes of internet and few minutes
>     of his
>     time: getting a tarball of CPython sources (or cloning the github
>     CPython
>     mirror)**, a basic text editor and msys-git. The step further, if
>     doing
>     some -even basic- C code is required, implies downloading 9GB of
>     Visual
>     Studio and countless hours for it to be ready to use.
>     I think downloading the whole Visual Studio suite is a huge stopper to
>     contribute further for an average medium-or-below-contributor.
>
>     I think (and I must not be the only one since CPython is to be moved
>     to github), that barriers to contribute to CPython should be set to
>     the lowest.
>     Of course my situation is a bit special but I think it represents
>     daily struggle of a *lot* of non-western programmer (at least for
>     limited internet)(even here in Australia, landline limited internet
>     connections are very common).
>     It's not a big deal if the MinGW result build is twenty time slower or
>     if some of the most advanced modules can't be build. But everyone
>     programmer should be able to easily make some C hacks and get them to
>     work.
>
>     Hoping you'll be receptive to my pleas,
>     Cheers
>
>
>     * I am currently picking fruits in the regional Australia. I live
>     in a van
>     and have internet through with smartphone through an EDGE
>     connection. I can
>     plug the laptop in the farm but not in the van.
>     ** No fresh programmer use mercurial unless he has a gun pointed
>     on his
>     head.
>     _______________________________________________
>     Python-Dev mailing list
>     Python-Dev at python.org <mailto:Python-Dev at python.org>
>     https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
>     Unsubscribe:
>     https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/leewangzhong%2Bpython%40gmail.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/tritium-list%40sdamon.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160227/93640f13/attachment-0001.html>