[Python-Dev] Aligning the packaging.python.org theme with the rest of the docs

M.-A. Lemburg mal at egenix.com
Sun May 28 08:07:54 EDT 2017


I'm -1 on going down the suggested route of Apple et al. for an
open source language.

We don't need more trademarks to "protect" ourselves against
fellow open source projects.

I see this whole trademark business that OSS projects are getting
into in recent years in a more and more critical light.

On one hand you have the open source idea, where you want to enable
anyone to reuse your code. The OSS copyright licenses implement this
idea nicely.

On the other hand, you have trademark law which limits
this reusability by imposing strict rules on how you can reuse the
names, designs, colors, etc. trademarked by the OSS project (or
else - TM lawyers tell you - you lose the rights to the TMs).

The latter has to be handled with great care, since while you
do want to protect the trademarks against malicious use by third
parties (e.g. a company registering the same mark and then preventing
use of the trademark in their jurisdiction), you don't want to
hinder the original intent of having an open source license. In
particular, you don't want to bully community projects which try to
further the use of our open source software by using similar marks.

In my role as PSF TM committee member, it's often painful to have to
tell community members that they cannot use e.g. really nice looking
variants of the Python logo for their projects. Let's not add more
pain.

If you want to make PSF related projects be recognized as such,
simply add the PSF logo to the footer of the site and provide
some blurb explaining the relationships to the about page.

We could also have a special "PSF Project" logo for such a
purpose. Use of the logo would then be subject to the TM
requirements, but not the looks and UI of the site.



On 28.05.2017 07:31, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 28 May 2017 at 06:54, Guido van Rossum <gvanrossum at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Are you also going to stop others from using the psf theme?
> 
> I think it would definitely make sense to discourage the use of this
> particular theme for projects that aren't relatively directly
> affiliated with the PSF - there are plenty of other pip-installable
> high contrast themes out there that aren't closely associated with a
> particular backing organisation.
> 
> The one Jon was originally considering for the PyPA docs was
> Alabaster, which is now the default theme in Sphinx 1.3+:
> https://alabaster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
> 
> So I think it would be appropriate to include a sentence like the
> following in the README for psf-docs-theme:
> 
> "Please limit use of this theme to projects which are closely
> affiliated with the Python Software Foundation, and have permission
> from either the CPython core development team or the PSF itself for
> such use. For other projects looking for a simple, high contrast, pip
> installable Sphinx theme, we recommend the Alabaster theme used by
> default in Sphinx 1.3+."
> 
> Cheers,
> Nick.
> 

-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg
eGenix.com

Professional Python Services directly from the Experts (#1, May 28 2017)
>>> Python Projects, Coaching and Consulting ...  http://www.egenix.com/
>>> Python Database Interfaces ...           http://products.egenix.com/
>>> Plone/Zope Database Interfaces ...           http://zope.egenix.com/
________________________________________________________________________

::: We implement business ideas - efficiently in both time and costs :::

   eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH  Pastor-Loeh-Str.48
    D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg
           Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611
               http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/
                      http://www.malemburg.com/



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list