[Python-ideas] The async API of the future: Reactors

Jasper St. Pierre jstpierre at mecheye.net
Mon Oct 15 17:39:57 CEST 2012

On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> But you're still stuck with implementing the names that someone else
> decided upon a decade ago... :-)

And why is that a bad thing? I don't see the value in having something
like: thing.set_data_received_callback(self.bake_some_eggs)

We're going to have to give *something* a name, eventually. Why not
pick it at the most direct level?

> --
> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list
> Python-ideas at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas


More information about the Python-ideas mailing list