ubershmekel at gmail.com
Sat Sep 1 23:55:39 CEST 2012
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> It's less Pythonic, because every sequence-like type (not just list)
> would have to reimplement it.
> Similar things get proposed for iterators (e.g. it1 + it2, it[:n],
> it[n:]) regularly and they are (and should be) rejected for the same
Python causes some confusion because some things are methods and others
builtins. Is there a PEP or rationale that defines what goes where?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Python-ideas