[Python-ideas] async/await in Python

[Yury Selivanov]

Hi Brett,

On 2015-04-18 9:23 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> +1 from me on the PEP! Very thorough and well argued.
Thanks a lot!

>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 6:57 PM Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Chris,
>> On 2015-04-17 6:46 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> On 2015-04-17 6:00 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 4:58 AM, Yury Selivanov <
>> yselivanov.ml at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>> [SNIP]
>>
>>>> Let's see what python-ideas thinks about it.  I'm fine if everybody
>>>> wants __future__ imports.  I will only have to rollback my changes
>>>> in tokenizer.c and change few tokens in Grammar to make the
>>>> reference implementation work.
>>> In case it wasn't clear from my previous post, I'm +1 on using a
>>> __future__ import. Victor's idea of an optional directive seems
>>> interesting, but I'm not sure how useful it'd be in reality; does
>>> complicating the rules offer more benefit than simply having a keyword
>>> governed by __future__?
>> I'm OK with __future__ import.  And I'll be extremely happy
>> if that's the only thing we'll be all discussing here ;-)
>>
>> Let's see how the discussion goes, and if everybody on the
>> list wants __future__ and Guido approves, I'll update
>> the PEP and ref implementation!
>>
> +1 for the __future__ statement.

I'm actually leaning towards it too...

Yury