[Python-ideas] async/await in Python

[Brett Cannon]

+1 from me on the PEP! Very thorough and well argued.

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 6:57 PM Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Chris,
> On 2015-04-17 6:46 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> On 2015-04-17 6:00 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 4:58 AM, Yury Selivanov <
> yselivanov.ml at gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> [SNIP]
>
> >
> >> Let's see what python-ideas thinks about it.  I'm fine if everybody
> >> wants __future__ imports.  I will only have to rollback my changes
> >> in tokenizer.c and change few tokens in Grammar to make the
> >> reference implementation work.
> > In case it wasn't clear from my previous post, I'm +1 on using a
> > __future__ import. Victor's idea of an optional directive seems
> > interesting, but I'm not sure how useful it'd be in reality; does
> > complicating the rules offer more benefit than simply having a keyword
> > governed by __future__?
> I'm OK with __future__ import.  And I'll be extremely happy
> if that's the only thing we'll be all discussing here ;-)
>
> Let's see how the discussion goes, and if everybody on the
> list wants __future__ and Guido approves, I'll update
> the PEP and ref implementation!
>

+1 for the __future__ statement.

-Brett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20150418/0de8f22a/attachment.html>